Post-Grant Patent Uncertainty Another core change of the America Invents Act is the creation of a

Author Image

By: Sean Fenske

Editor-in-Chief

Post-Grant Patent Uncertainty


Another core change of the America Invents Act is the creation of a nine-month, post-grant opposition review period. This provision is effective one year from enactment of the bill, but applies only to first-inventor-to-file applications filed 18 months after enactment. The post-grant review process allows companies to challenge patents on any grounds of invalidity during a nine-month window from the issue date of a patent, with an aim of shifting the patent challenging arena from the courts to the USPTO. If the goal of post-grant opposition is achieved, the medtech industry will benefit from a reduction in costly and time-consuming patent litigation.


Moreover, an ongoing post-grant review will help ensure that high-quality patent applications deserving of patent rights are issued. Much like the first-inventor-to-file change, however, this provision is more valuable to large medtech companies with the budget to consistently monitor and challenge competitors’ patents. A decrease in litigation also may not occur to the extent expected because final post-grant review decisions are appealable to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Though more relevant to companies with larger budgets and resources, engaging in post-grant opposition review will allow medtech companies to directly affect the quality of industry patents and potentially invalidate competitors’ newly issued patents.


Keep Up With Our Content. Subscribe To Medical Product Outsourcing Newsletters